Well, I debated this in my mind. I concede that accounting- and entity- wise I erred in moving this capex from Visser to LQMT. Thanks for catching this.
Now, on this comment, I render my disagreement. We know as a fact that the 250,000 for the forth quarter was for shipments made in DECEMBER ONLY and probably toward the latter part. Pro-rated and augmented because of start-up delays and set-up tweaks, I believe that 1st quarter could be much higher. So I do believe that a 1Q run sequentially of 450K in Jan, 500K in Feb and 600K in Mar, is not beyond possibility, since I do not believe that the December run was at say, 100% machine capacity, but probably less than 50%. Just my opinion based upon understanding of start-up, set-up, industrial engineering type delays. At any rate, since there are numberous assumptions, all of which could be wrong or certainly off the mark, this is a difficult exercise. However, I think it is worthwhile to consider, none the less
I think that STEIP, you and I and most longs would concur in this. I value your input. Thanks.