again, I am personally aware of that content. My statements reflect that content accurately IMO. Others want to SPIN that content, good for them.
SKISS SAID !!!! "So, we're able to very heavily leverage off of *what we've done in the past, [grand fathered first mover]* so it's *not as expensive [not spending money]* for us today to support. *At some point in time,* however, *we'll actually have to put real hands and feet into building stuff [at some point we will have to spend money]*. *It's a little too early yet [they are not ready]*. *There's not quite enough clarity [we’ve been burned before CyberCOMM]* as to how all the pieces fit together* to actually sit down and actually start coding things*[spending money]. So we're really all still participating in the architectural how is it going to work, what's the basic picture phase, before we start pouring concrete [pouring conrete/ dropping serious coin] for the house. "
Which IS, and in RESPONSE TO the QUESTIONER, we are not flowing resources into this, we expect that our previous efforts in the TCG space will afford us first mover advantage, we are confident, but we are not going to throw money at everything that looks like a standard until it happens (see e.g. CyberCOMM)
Snackman, why are you harassing my content today? You so busy seeking and harassing my content, you can’t seem to see it was rather bullish.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
