Replies to post #136168 on World Surveillance Group Inc (fka WSGI)

[mide]

I like your hypothetical actually if it could be true, as it would indicate a change to stronger hands off-market and was done so as to not suppress the open share price.

It really matters not in the wash what he is or isn't doing with his holdings as the company will rise or fall independent of his actions. As a 6% common holder he is not entitled to anymore or less information than we have currently.

Oh, just my opinion, but I believe Brio and Hudson are both all finished and gone. That the volume has justified. Current sell pressure is coming from a different mechanism gadget.

Nils can confirm this, I think, but shorts against a box do not show up in the shorting inventory.

imo

m

[globalworker]

Maybe somethin related to the Hudson settlement?? Maybe an alternate way of investing in the company? Maybe not.

[Gotcha Sucka]

If he's an insider he needs to disclose his sales. The question is then, is he an insider? Not just the amount of shares but the information given to him that wasn't given to the public to cajole that investment. If he received no information and bought in a vacuum like the rest of us, he's not an insider. If he received information we didn't and bought based on that information, he's an insider. Percentage of ownership isn't the only determining factor, which is why buying private shares on private information makes one an insider.