InvestorsHub Logo

lsuitln

08/19/05 4:16 PM

#155965 RE: ct_here #155961

about the cox deal


if cox carried the channel in one area, it'd carry it on all of them. BUT subscribers would have to PAY for the channel. it seems that people are geting confused on the "NATIONAL" part -- do people feel that means if you have cox cable, you can turn on qbid 24/7? nope! please respond if you have a constructive response. thanks

skunksyard

08/19/05 4:17 PM

#155966 RE: ct_here #155961

ct....I think you put this in perspective yesterday and Richard in his email verified it....zandant clarified that if anyone doesn't know the definition of 'license' that person may have misunderstood...

this is what I took from your information yesterday ct...

regardless of whether it was a 'license' or actual 'carriage' (but I did read the word license only because we are so familiar with the TWC 'hunting license')....the fact remains COX made a commitment to QTN to explore carriage with their units...

now we will wait out the results....there are several areas in the Cox world that are gay populated....

and most coverage can be found on this map

http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/IROL/76/76341/reports/AR_2003/glance.html

kcjonser

08/19/05 4:18 PM

#155967 RE: ct_here #155961

CT...thanks for following up on that for some clarification. If Frank does have a downfall, it is the way PR's are written and I hope this gets resovled down the line. In some respects, it really won't matter because evil ones will always find some way to twist words on paper. It is like that with all public companies, not just ours. Thanks again.