Replies to post #2246 on Velatel Global Comm. (fka VELA)

[LongTimeObserver]

These are new and troubling questions, butterfly007, that add to older but still nagging questions about CHTL/VELA management and touts' (Smith, Chacon, others) credibility and use of proceeds of share sales.

[Doc.007]

Velatel’s Situation Report - April 9, 2012 - Supplement

Grammatically corrected and completed Point 4. as replacement.

4. The Joinmax Ltd. or Trussnet Ltd in HK, by Velatel stocks every 3 months
got over US$ 1 million paid during the past 4 years, but for what for and
to outside of Velatel nobody ever substantiated and by details became to
see or to know about ! What for the paid US$ 20 millions ?
If we considered above Point 2., then they beside of only installing 2 smaller
internet-transmitters-test-units with a lot of Velatel’s Blah-Blah of not fulfilling,
they under Velatel’s control and order did do nothing else to complete the
Chinese projects.
Resulting its legitimated to ask, if they by its VELA stock-sales-dumping for
getting money from Investors and reducing the stock-price, has its main job
been for putting the money in a money-laundering pension-basket for all the
global Friends and Families related to Velatel. That’s where the 20 millions ?
Has this been the main Velatel declared engineering & consulting job of them ?
Beside did they only check the fiber-cables at Sino Crossings project, if the
known mouse-invasion at Chinas countryside did or did not partially eating the
plastic-insulations or may partially the complete fiber-cables, or did they do
not even that ? By Velatel’s not fulfilling or attitudes we must expect this !
( This also for everybody to think about and to create its own opinions. )


2nd PS: We will see what the US-Authorities will say to this and find-out !

[Doc.007]

1. ZTE without Velatel ----- 2. Velatel’s Contracts or Agreements

1. ZTE without Velatel. Putting yesterday “Telcom Mobile Internet” into Google
and it can be found the publication informing about ZTE received from China
Telcom a 60% Stake, for ZTE now installing for them Mobile Internet & Phone
at 12 cities in China.
This reconfirms “Velatel’s Situation Report-April 9, 2012/ Points 1. to 4. and 8.

2. Velatel’s Contracts or Agreements. All Contracts or Agreements for deposition
and impression purposes only deposited by SEC-Filings, are by the SEC not as
legally correct approved, because the SEC-Filings themselves can only as
statements from solely Velatel itself been interpreted.
The by Velatel’s SEC-Filings deposited contract or agreement statements, not
copies of original signed contracts or agreements, not have any signatures of
all related parties.
For related to Asian it means any contract or agreement can only exist
as such, if by 1st is with personal stamp been stamped or 2nd with personal
stamp been stamped plus hand made signature, by some matters even with
an additional finger-print. It means since all this at SEC-filings is missing,
that the contracts or agreements without legalized not legally in force and
therefore must bee assumed by abusing the trust of SEC, that Velatel itself
just constructed it. This for the time Velatel did not proving it otherwise.