InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 31
Posts 6277
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 03/25/2012

Re: Doc.007 post# 2246

Wednesday, 04/11/2012 8:55:46 AM

Wednesday, April 11, 2012 8:55:46 AM

Post# of 9346
1. ZTE without Velatel ----- 2. Velatel’s Contracts or Agreements

1. ZTE without Velatel. Putting yesterday “Telcom Mobile Internet” into Google
and it can be found the publication informing about ZTE received from China
Telcom a 60% Stake, for ZTE now installing for them Mobile Internet & Phone
at 12 cities in China.
This reconfirms “Velatel’s Situation Report-April 9, 2012/ Points 1. to 4. and 8.

2. Velatel’s Contracts or Agreements. All Contracts or Agreements for deposition
and impression purposes only deposited by SEC-Filings, are by the SEC not as
legally correct approved, because the SEC-Filings themselves can only as
statements from solely Velatel itself been interpreted.
The by Velatel’s SEC-Filings deposited contract or agreement statements, not
copies of original signed contracts or agreements, not have any signatures of
all related parties.
For related to Asian it means any contract or agreement can only exist
as such, if by 1st is with personal stamp been stamped or 2nd with personal
stamp been stamped plus hand made signature, by some matters even with
an additional finger-print. It means since all this at SEC-filings is missing,
that the contracts or agreements without legalized not legally in force and
therefore must bee assumed by abusing the trust of SEC, that Velatel itself
just constructed it. This for the time Velatel did not proving it otherwise.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.