How do we know that is not what is happening? It was curious that the "company line" so quickly put up by PinkSheets after the company's July 19th PR came down after complaints to the regulators. When contacted why the OS figures (that had been there for several weeks) were taken down a song and dance about confusion which occurred around the week of 5/17 was given out.
If this were the true reason then why in mid July did pinksheets discard the issue and post the company line?
Pinksheets original viewpoint seemed to be that the trades the week of 5/17 should be wiped away (benefiting the insider whose mistake is forgiven). Then their viewpoint was 100% consistent with the company on the OS. They have been on the companies side the whole way. Why then in early August did they change the OS to "UNKNOWN" from the comapnies line? Why did they leave the Authorized at 100M even though the company increased the Authorized to trillions?
How do we not know that a regulator TOLD pinksheets to remove the OS since in the regulator's opinion it was incorrect? If that is what had happened would Pinksheets either been allowed to say that or have said that if they could have given their popular support for the company?
Does a vested interest exist between Pinksheets and the company? Does GVRP/MAMG pay Pinksheets in any way for Services rendered? Does any kind of business relationship exist between the two?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
