InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Crow3

03/24/12 9:52 AM

#37740 RE: Amanita #37739

This BK was planned not forced

Exactly..you put it exactly right.

Is MP inonit? Hard to imagine that he is not. But he got himself put on the creditors committee through his IAM thingy.

A stockholder committee is needed. JEN and MILLIE..need to start it. Contact the Trustee. You won't be heard if you don't insist.
icon url

sea_urchin

03/24/12 11:34 AM

#37741 RE: Amanita #37739

Who was that poster who right from the start kept saying two or three creditors forced the BK on poor JB/the company? He planted that seed on the board and regularly fed and watered it.

My guess is he and MP introduced the entire idea to JB and educated him on how it would work.

What it seems they didn't count on was an alert Trustee. Maybe they thought they could slip one by a sleepy Trustee way out in the wilds of AZ. After all, apparently not many courts seem to object to "loan to own" schemes, from what I've read.

However, from the tone of the Trustee's objection, partially posted elsewhere, I'd say she objected strongly.

Oops whoops.

Further, of course, is the curiosity question of who else (besides that poster) the SEC met with in LA. I don't think it's just a cowinkydink that said poster suddenly lost his voice right after that meeting, which meeting he was so excited to attend.

Oops whoops.

icon url

d4diddy

03/24/12 5:09 PM

#37742 RE: Amanita #37739

"This BK was planned not forced. Hopefully the trustee will root this out."

As I said earlier, they stick fairly close to the same blueprint. Last time they sued themselves with the help of insiders Mari and Robert as moles, this time they're bankrupting themselves with the help of the 'Rogue Three'.

There is absoultely NO WAY that CDEx was caught off guard, this has been planned all along.

Notice how hard Pennstreet/Kidinsight tried to shift blame to the 'Rogue Three' while praising JB. Same exact con game as last time.

The results will be the same as well, the crooks come out on top walking away scott-free, the shareholders get screwed once again.