InvestorsHub Logo

noquit

03/20/12 11:32 AM

#78727 RE: Nooneother #78725

It may have been a response to unsubstantiated CLAIMS of NSS, long after this stock had a viable chance to come back with the authorized shares all maxed out.

Even FINRA gets tired of being used as the fall guy.

The failed reverse split may have been a direct result of the above.

This stock has never benefitted shareholders from earnings, in all the time it's been around, but the CEO has prospered.

Suspect

03/20/12 11:40 AM

#78728 RE: Nooneother #78725

It is pretty clear why securities are designated trade for trade. I don't see naked shorting listed.

NSCC typically designates these broker-to-broker transactions to settle trade-for-trade if they involve securities that have been chilled or globally locked for operational, risk management, or regulatory or compliance reasons.



http://www.dtcc.com/news/press/releases/2010/aggregating_trade_obligations.php