exactly! That is exactly how i wanted that to come out... is that now how it came out? my point being that no that impairment is out of the picture if we had no additional hiring we would break even bc our 575 k loss last year is mostly offset with a 575 increase this year with no hiring so we are almost break even.
the impairment is what is diluting and making our operating loss whenwe are really almost break even. but the impairment wont be on the books going forward improving BS,CF,and IS.
Is that making sense or am I coming across poorly on the board? sorry if i am confusing people.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
