Instead of blaming the legal system, or Nokia, why not blame IDCC management, and the gap between the commercial value of the patent portfolio, and the raised expectations of shareholders? When IDCC abandoned their chip business, they became relegated to being a pure play IPR shop, making nothing. To play that game, they needed a better patent portfolio, and a lot of luck in the litigation lotto. While other companies are collaborating and doing business, IDCC is suing prospective "partners". Now that the SA failed, they're left with a litigation business.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
