Hi, Sorry I couldn't respond sooner, but I spent my 15 posts without being able to correct a few posts I made earlier. I now understand why flockastock responded the way he did.
It is obvious since PDQtail pointed it out and rereading the "full quote" I could understand why he thought I was "anti Tiger". The one thing I was stating in my vague way is the immeasurable impact Tiger has on a product even though it might be negative (scandal) or positive (golf god).
All this being said and all that involves the "Tiger phenomena", we couldn't ask for a better spokesperson. This man could even make shat sell and this(FUSE) ain't that.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
