I agree the AMI-Wave news IS the Microsoft-Wave news, and it is worthy of reconsideration and substantial attention, and even deserving to be a motivation to BUY MORE SHARES. Below are paragraphs 5, 6 and 7 you cite, and they portend large revenues, because the solution--WEM--would seem to be the kind of backbone security every user, every Windows OS buyer, would obviously want on their deskto/laptop/tablet/mobile device. My question regards the business model. Will it be:
1. WEM Licensed by Microsoft as a standard security support feature? My opinion, not likely. But possible. Even if it were, Wave would likely make less revenue overall on the per unit basis MS would pay, versus what either the PC OEM or the upgrade customer would pay 2. WEM Licensed by the PC OEMs, a la Dell. This could be for enterprise or consumer machines or both--the lines are blurring anyway. Would definitely be for defense industrial base and government at least. This could be very lucrative because of the pervasive need, at least in the enterprise/gov't worlds. 3. WEM Sold by Wave as an upgrade, a la ERAS (or in an upgrade suite with ERAS, etc). This is least lucrative, at least initially, because of the risk of not winning the sale, but could still be lucrative long term, if the trajectory of ERAS is continued and repeated for WEM.
Overall point: Wave promises to be part of the fabric of the future of computing and connectivity, and that future is now pretty close. As close as Windows 8. Wave's present is not that shabby either, worthy of holding tens or hundreds of thousands of shares, IMO.