InvestorsHub Logo

fourkids_9pets

03/03/12 10:30 AM

#102440 RE: Acc441 #102418

feel free to believe that

the gushing fawning posts
accompanied the curious trades

the curious trades were trades
that were wash traded between
the entities who had by then
successfully orchestrated one
run in (july 2009) in exph and
were *waiting* for the second
to commence (sept 2009) my rt
observations of said curious trades
(from memory) was late july 2009
or very early in august 2009 >> and
clearly noted via the tapes of trades
i would begin to document on EXPH

in 2009 ETC >> was very much a factor
of the co.s transition to what i call
the next level >> that still didn't mitigate
or negate the risk and wouldn't ~ sadly the
events of late fall 2009 and early into 2010
would impact the co.s future >> death spirals
on the poorly watched OTC >> come in many guises


there were multiple issues at *work* >> and against
EXPO ensuring that *survival* in the worst economy
since the great depression wasn't an option with one
aspect in no doubt >> the no. of EXPH shares abusively
shorted

and it's the only aspect i'm interested in knowing the answer to
is did mgmt participate?


imo the answer continues to be no (mgmt's shares were still held
via cert form) and the TA has no reason to lie even tho' posts
have indicated the TA is *involved* >> it's not an *opinion*
i share
>> not surprising (but ironic) that the TA is owed monies

regardless the FACTS will come from the authorities in due course
info has been in their hands across multiple levels from sept 2009
to june 2010

==
4kids
all jmo