InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

JRLopehandia

02/26/12 1:44 PM

#6888 RE: ADubiousCharacter #6887

Dubious, thanks for respecting my Family name, they have nothing to do with Barrick and want nothing to do with them either. That is why we are with MWR.

You asked:

1) Barrick claims that the earthworks in Chile are 80% completed. They claim that the mine has probable reserves of 17.8 million ounces of gold. If I read your recent message correctly, you are saying that Barrick is falsifying all of this, and that they do not have a development in Chile, or that it is in a different location than your claims.

RESPONSE:

80% of Earth works to build buildings that shall never run.

If Barrick had turned around 80% of the mountain, we would notice, that is 100's of millions of tons.

Regarding the reserves:

LAC drilled AMARILLOS 1-3000 andsold the salts concessions to Barrick.

Barrick drilled the salts concessions of lAC and found Gold more even and reported it.

I am saying LAC'S titles are dead at 2012, salts & nitrates not allowing Barrick to mine the Gold they drilled and LAC drilled.

I own the areas and they are not even allowed in.

They are playing make belive at Chilean Contractors paid structures and earth movement, in areas destined to PROCESS the ore, WAY from the ore body under my legal control today. IS THAT CLEAR?

Remember the lifespan is 20+ years.

I think you are buying Barrick's foolishness such as PASCUA a US40 Gold oz, closed due to low Gold prices.

You asked

2) You say that Barrick has not been successful against you in their libel suit.

* 100% correct, not even the title they said to own when suing me, they own 2012, that title was under my control then and today.

* Barrick will get its hands shopped off if extended to get one red cent from me, from Pascua 2012 or for libel 2002.

You said:


"The records of the Ontario court show that they won a judgment against you (BTW, everyone doing DD should read the judgment, as there are some troubling details in there). Are you saying that the judgment was later reversed, or simply that you never paid the bill? "

LIBEL Attorneys indicated that action has NO WEIGH and Barrick has only a proven CRIMINAL FRAUD

Your fear monguering obeys to this lawsuit right?

http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onca/doc/2004/2004canlii12938/2004canlii12938.html

Now go to facts 9) Barrick owns PASCUA LAMA with VILLAR & MORENOS titles, PASCUA = 25% of Barrick's Gold.

Now go to www.minapascua1996-2011.com and rejoyce if you are a true MWR shareholder or cry me rivers if you are a Barrick and Peter Munk's fraud supporter.

Your BTW MWR, heed to the fear that Jorge Lopehandia is a crook as barrick says and Barrick really owns PASCUA as per facts 9 of that criminal lawsuit?

is it Better to wait MWR as we are caught at ABX?

Now that I have answered decently, go back to your sender or bosses or make up your honest mind.

As per me, your questions only show me that youare nothing close to the true MWR shareholders I know.

No more investment advice for you, you have failed at grasping or even scratching the glass tower with your ABX's criminal libel as soapy wet hands