InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

pitts77h

02/21/12 10:50 PM

#23236 RE: captschippy #23235

LOL. No, your argument is simply wrong and it's all very easy to understand. You say funding exists, I say "prove it." Of course you CAN'T, because not even the company itself has made that absurd claim.

If you want to explore further, I suggest you examine the concept known as "Argument from Ignorance."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance

Argument from ignorance, also known as argumentum ad ignorantiam or "appeal to ignorance" (where "ignorance" stands for: "lack of evidence to the contrary"), is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false, ... In debates, appeals to ignorance are sometimes used to shift the burden of proof.

Argument from ignorance may be used as a rationalization by a person who realizes that he has no reason for holding the belief that he does.



There's really no need to get so abstract however. Either you can show some evidence of funding, or you can't.









icon url

crazyjogger925

02/21/12 10:55 PM

#23237 RE: captschippy #23235

my theory when funding is announced some here will pull a BAGDAD BOB and claim it aint true.imo its very tough to win with a few here.imo
icon url

EarnestDD

02/22/12 11:54 AM

#23258 RE: captschippy #23235

ONUS is on EEGC to prove Funding exists ... and EEGC is eerily silent.
lolol
jmo