InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 53
Posts 10633
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/21/2011

Re: captschippy post# 23235

Tuesday, 02/21/2012 10:50:20 PM

Tuesday, February 21, 2012 10:50:20 PM

Post# of 42999
LOL. No, your argument is simply wrong and it's all very easy to understand. You say funding exists, I say "prove it." Of course you CAN'T, because not even the company itself has made that absurd claim.

If you want to explore further, I suggest you examine the concept known as "Argument from Ignorance."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance

Argument from ignorance, also known as argumentum ad ignorantiam or "appeal to ignorance" (where "ignorance" stands for: "lack of evidence to the contrary"), is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false, ... In debates, appeals to ignorance are sometimes used to shift the burden of proof.

Argument from ignorance may be used as a rationalization by a person who realizes that he has no reason for holding the belief that he does.



There's really no need to get so abstract however. Either you can show some evidence of funding, or you can't.










"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it."

Upton Sinclair

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.