Just as soon as it is proved that it does "NOT" exist. This is mearly a back and forth that is not proved by either side. IMO...In either event, What is evident is that eegc will have to prove its position in the very near future. Therefore, it would seem that there is not much profit in a back and forth arguement as to what position about eegc is the correct one. And remember, It was I who responded to the claim you asserted, per your post that funding did not exist. I believe the burden of proof is on you.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
