InvestorsHub Logo

buzztech911

02/20/12 7:32 PM

#4476 RE: Joe_Smoe #4475

merger baby weeeeeeeee
the buzzy knows what the buzzy knows
big changes on the way
hint take a look at all the new blood(people) at sf
now how do you find that out.

scotlandrules

02/20/12 9:00 PM

#4478 RE: Joe_Smoe #4475

I'm only in this for a short time more. I'm pretty much 50/50 on SFOR. They have many un-explained things BUT it sure looks like they actually sell a product, of course I've been the fool many many times before with pennies in that area.

The un-explained things bother me:
1) No office.
2) No employees (that I can find).
3) No facility for R&D and such.
4) The phone doesn't ring where the office address is listed.
5) The building where they have an address listed is also the same address for a plethera of scam companies. So it means that address is nothing more than a drop box.
6) SFOR's phone was previously registered to a company (I forget the name now) that was a scam selling radar detectors in Russia. And it wasn't just closed out and SFOR obtained the number, it was changed over to SFOR.
7) They have a U.S. Patent, which in itself isn't difficult to get even if the product isn't real, and especially with computer code. But what concerns me is that they don't have European Patents. A U.S. Patents is only good in the U.S. SFOR claims to be possibly doing overseas biz. So why not a European Patent? The cost is high, I know that.

And of the scam pennies I got conned into losing it all, had at least 4 of the items I listed above going on. Doesn't mean SFOR is a shady scam, its just things I uncovered in a relatively short time. I'm more more than happy to see SFOR go boom!

dounome

02/21/12 8:34 AM

#4486 RE: Joe_Smoe #4475

Joe you make it sound as if SFOR just started last year,its been around for a long long time your just new to the stock. Thats why you have a different waiting time.