InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

aredrooster

02/02/12 11:18 AM

#113098 RE: Newbie_Niobium #113097



The problem is, if Scott left, so would the PPS. IMHO
icon url

jfburk

02/02/12 11:26 AM

#113100 RE: Newbie_Niobium #113097

All Scott or anyone else in the company needs to do as watch this board to see why there is such secrecy inside the company. There are people here with a negative agenda and I know for a fact Scott has been burned in the past by open mouths in the wrong places.

I, too, would be leery of being too open while on the pinksheets and fully expect an uplist will correct this problem. Too many flippers, too many inexperienced business people, too many immature traders who rely on pump and dump companies for their 25% return.

I remain long in this company, continue to communicate directly with the company and remain happy with my investment. others here need to grow up and realize that this is an investment stock not a trading stock. People don't complain about the day to day activities of an investment stock but always are vocal on trading stocks.

You want a pump and dump company? go somewhere else, but if you want a company for the long term, welcome aboard. A lot of money has been spent in the past to show that the rocks are there. The SP went to .20 a couple years ago and we are better today than we were then, bigger holdings and more positive progress that many want to acknowledge. Unless someone comes in and steals the rocks the asset value of this company continues to grow.

icon url

FlatEarthSoc

02/02/12 12:14 PM

#113109 RE: Newbie_Niobium #113097

lmao!

Scott's job is to find properties with potential and bring them to production or sell them. He should do this in a way that brings the most value to the shareholders. He has no control over the daily PPS and this should not be his focus. As the property gets closer to production the PPS will take care of itself.

"If this was trade on the amex" ...it wouldn't be a junior explorer working on it's first property

icon url

downsideup

02/02/12 1:57 PM

#113122 RE: Newbie_Niobium #113097

Hogwash.

CEO's are responsible for the direction of the business... and they're responsible for creating value... here, for finding and expanding the value of resources, and for enabling future market recognition of the value developed, over time... but, unless there is misbehavior occurring among insiders, they're not generally in control of or responsible for the individual choices of or the market behaviors of investors, or for the patterns apparent in the trading of the stock.

SRSR management have made it clear they're not particularly happy with the patterns in the trading in the stock, and they clearly intend to address those issues, among others, by changing the venues in which shares are traded. They're making that happen.