InvestorsHub Logo

litton51

01/21/12 12:01 PM

#54010 RE: longhorn 53 #54008

The alleged settlement has been hidden from the company's owners -- us. That alone is enough reason to get rid of Turrini and Pierce, and possibly an unlawful act on their part. The 8Ks have no basis in any information supplied to shareholders or the SEC. The years of zero deals is more reason to get rid of these people.

Cougar6

01/21/12 12:14 PM

#54012 RE: longhorn 53 #54008

They did not need the settlement to make deals. There was a stipulation in the State case that gave us full rights to license the patent.

Remember the talk about the trip Turrini made to New York over the summer? The potential contract with Valenti? We have had the ability to license the patent. Yet no deals.

I was a newbe who believed in Turrini but as his claims and excuses continued to diverge from what I was actually reading in the court documents and the inconsistencies in any logical connection between what I was being asked to believe by management supporters and my own knowledge of business rules and laws it became clear I was being expected to believe in a fantasy.

I don't believe in a global conspiracy. I do believe that management is incompetent, and are willing to hide that incompetence behind excuses - the biggest being that it is all Williams fault and that Diac is on our side.

downsideup

01/22/12 6:11 AM

#54035 RE: longhorn 53 #54008

You know... I don't like your attitude... so, I have determined that I've got a dispute with you...

Why don't we settle it. Just give me 20% of everything you have... and I'll let it pass, and promise I'll be satisfied with that, and then we can go back to working together... So, let it pass... ?

And then... after you agree... I come back a year later and say... Hey, you know... I don't think that was enough ? How about you you give me another 20%... ??? We could fight about it... but it would so destructive if we did... and it would be much easier if you'd just cooperate... and give me another 20%...