Replies to post #36760 on Kraig Biocraft Laboratories Inc (KBLB)

[manshoon1]

IMHO the reason that SWA and other stock newsletters did not cover the PNAS publication is that the publication was of work that was done a considerable amount of time ago.

No, completely false.

Such newsletters are interested mainly in news about what the company is doing now and what directly affects its commercial prospects.

No, pump newsletters will use anything in the past, present, but what they do best is arouse suspicion about the future...... using "what if's"

Swalert has put out countless KBLB pumps RECAPPING on old PR's.

If the upcoming PR's are anywhere near as significant as I suspect they will be, the newsletters will cover it whether paid to or not, because they wouldn't want to miss out on an opportunity to have a success story to brag about. JMHO

No not even close. Swalert does not care what is significant or not. they will make ANY PR sound significant.

[igotthemojo]

in other words there is no validation of the work that is being done now or for the past 15 months...