InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

NASCOW

01/06/12 10:20 PM

#355437 RE: Ed Dantes #355436

Here's where the TPS argument and objections will come into play; in addition to DIMEQ pushing for their belief in the LTW contract conversion ratio

Holders of preferred and common won't be able to have their cake and eat it to if this comes to pass...especially if the reward is better to do so, than it is to allow common to survive; again if TFjmw takes that path...IMO
icon url

jhdf51

01/06/12 10:23 PM

#355442 RE: Ed Dantes #355436

Great point Ed.
icon url

gophilipgo

01/07/12 1:36 PM

#355652 RE: Ed Dantes #355436

Ps won't be wiping themselves out by voting "no". However, they will be limiting the amount of NOLs available from $17 billion to $6 billion if I understand correctly. But unlike the $17 billion, the $6 billion is unrestricted, and as we all know, the $6 billion is what the SNHs were after. But, they had the cash to utilize them. NewCo doesn't. So as far as the best scenario for NewCo--owned by only preferreds or shared with commons--it's a toss-up, in my opinion.