Zip
I believe that any motions for recusal will be out of desperation. It is a dangerous game unless you have something other than cases in common. It is a direct insult to the integrity and ethics of a judge. I believe that she is going over the evidence very thoroughly and if she upholds the verdict of the jury and enhances damages, she is just doing her job. The fact that she has been privy to the financials of Ericy as a result of Harris is not proof that she is biased or prejudiced toward the company. They would need additional evidence to be successful in a recusal motion. Waiting to file on the basis of being in receipt of information that would render her incapable of conducting a fair and impartial trial would be suspect since she had the same information at the initial transfer and assignment of the IDCC case. If I was the Ericy attorney, I would consider it an advantage because the judge may have a natural tendency to be more than fair due to her own perception of fairness. Since Ericy has not filed that we are aware, I do not look for a recusal motion.
MO
loop
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
