livefree -- let's be realistic. Most of the requests of the EC cannot be answered -- like the questions I've read on "what is the new post-emergence PPS", etc -- the DS is not going to say that, nor will the EC. They can't, the market will determine all PPS, not the EC, etc. And the math and the permutations are in the DS -- it's just a lot to compute.
I am sure that the EC receives numerous requests and random emails, etc.
But when one is well worded, and very specific, and gets a reply -- then what is the attack on such a thing?
Let me get it straight -- should I NOT bring that information here?
Certainly the attacks have worked their way down -- originally on the Debtors, then THJMW, then to S&G, and now to MW, and the rest of the EC.
The forgetful part on most is that the DEBTORS (Eg, Weil, and A&M) have been the total betrayers here. And since 'we' can't seem to do anything about that, we work down the list, now it's lately MW.
The original posters question was well phrased, targeted, and the reply provided.
Ironically - "Sorry again if I upset all of your postiive thoughts here." -- there are numerous people who think all I am is negative :)
Oh well. I'm pragmatic. That's a difficult concept for many.
...Catz
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
