InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Ed Dantes

12/25/11 11:44 PM

#353679 RE: jackfburns #353652

I am right there with ya Jack, and even more disturbed that he was posting under a yahoo name of Hammr6. WTF ???

And furthermore, I would like to pose a serious question to Don (fsshn) because you are operating under the premise that once we take control of the newCo, it's grow, merge, grow, merge, grow, merge providing the real value in the next 12-24 months. That confidence indicates that the person in charge of the NewCo would know what they F$#@ they are doing. That sure as hell doesn't sound like MW. This guy sounds like anything but, and they are more and more all in it for the carcass of cash that is left.

There is the school of thought (and hope) by some, that SG are these master strategists and this is a plot to trap the debtors where they want them and they have all these things lined up......then there is the school of thought that says nah, SG is completely clueless and what you see is what you are gonna get. I really want to and have believed the former, but there are very strong signs right now that point out the obvious on the latter.

What do you think Don? Even you have to step back and be concerned at how this has turned in the last week or so. I know I sure am.

icon url

umaw

12/25/11 11:47 PM

#353680 RE: jackfburns #353652

Me too, Jackfburns!
icon url

oilstrike

12/26/11 12:41 AM

#353681 RE: jackfburns #353652

I tell ya Jack. Ever since I was in the position to contemplate MW stature/history/holdings; I've wondered and just let it be, but now-a-days I've changed my posture, but am still in the mode of seeing what happens next.
Conflict of interest with regard to MW has always been a forerunner in my perception. My "jury" is in and on station.