Large, it is an interesting viewpoint that Susman would be working "behind the scenes" with TPS. However, why be on board with a settlement, quoting that the EC and counsel are very happy/support the plan, the mediator was very effective, and so forth when they could've easily stated that they tried and worked very closely with the debtors to resolve all issues but was unsuccessful? Thus, the EC showed that they've made a true effort but since it did not yield any fruit, will now join DIMEQs and TPS in opposing the DS/POR. Wouldn't this be the way to go?