The SEC says they didn't. Do you know why I know this to be true? Because not once but twice the S-1 registration has been submitted for approval and the SEC has approved it twice. You have said that the company explaining the agreement in detail was pure nonsense and was defenseless. Do you want to know why they explained it in detail? Because it was a SEC requirement to do so in order to receive approval of the S-1 registration and they have done so, not once but twice. So, what is defenseless is making accusations when you have no knowledge of the SEC requirements when you file an S-1 registration for approval.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
