Replies to post #19100 on Intel Corp (INTC)

[The Duke of URL]

The article is a conclusion by one of the lesser of the Inq minions,

and the basis for the article is a URL to DigiTimes WHICH SAYS NOTHING ABOUT THE SUBJECT MATTER

AND, if you can believe this,

a link to Keith's post at SI repeating a rumor.

I am telling you, you do this shit in Court and you had better bring your toothbrush.

[The Duke of URL]

More breaking news from the Inq about case:

Intel given extension to AMD complaint

Two more subpoenas served


By INQUIRER staff: Thursday 14 July 2005, 15:00

ANOTHER SET of dockets have popped up in the antitrust case AMD is levelling against Intel.
Intel has now been given until September 6th to respond


Court Clerk goes to Lunch!!!!!!!!

Federal Office building opens at 7:30 AM to accept AMD filings!!!!

Bob when out to go to the outhouse, and the Hogs ate him!!!!

More trumped up events to keep AMD complaint alive, seen failing.

News at 11.

[imho]

chipdesigner,

re: Intel "gives permission" for firms to buy AMD chips

I hope the OEMs kept the letters/taped the calls.

I have personally called them up and asked them to destroy them.

Here's a link for you NOT written by "Olga"

http://www.forbes.com/technology/2005/07/14/amd-intel-lawsuit-cx_vnu_0714amd.html?partner=yahootix

IMHO