InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

great-grandma

07/14/05 4:34 PM

#658 RE: bocxman #654

Bocxman: I agree that a PMA would be best. Better to have good solid data to support you than to just have "preliminary results". I also agree that publication in a peer-reviewed journal is a good thing, but the sooner we get exposure in something like Science, JAMA[/], or The New England Journal of Medicine the better. I think this will happen when we finally have the results of a larger study. Perhaps this will be done by Abbott or Goshen. We need a name journal with a high impact factor.