InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,615.35
(
0.55%
)
US TECH 100
19,804.00
(
0.64%
)
Dow Jones
40,000.90
(
0.62%
)
Brent Oil
84.57
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
59,770.79
(
0.91%
)
Post# of 30387
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

great-grandma

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 387
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/16/2005

great-grandma

Re: bocxman post# 654

Thursday, 07/14/2005 4:34:05 PM

Thursday, July 14, 2005 4:34:05 PM

Post# of 30387
Bocxman: I agree that a PMA would be best. Better to have good solid data to support you than to just have "preliminary results". I also agree that publication in a peer-reviewed journal is a good thing, but the sooner we get exposure in something like Science, JAMA[/], or The New England Journal of Medicine the better. I think this will happen when we finally have the results of a larger study. Perhaps this will be done by Abbott or Goshen. We need a name journal with a high impact factor.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up