Replies to post #3941 on Consumer Automotive Finance Inc (CAFI)

[bigbrr]

The fact of the matter is....When I started questioning the lies being posted here you guys called me everything in the book, very few things have been posted by the so called bashers except cold hard car business facts, none of the longs even dispute the facts anymore they just attack the messenger, why is that? What about the filings? what about the outrageous predictions? what about the Tucson lot not having a lic. prior to July? what about the sunbusted lot selling other dealers vehicles???????? WHERE IS THAT JUNE FILING?
jmho!
You Stated above

My thoughts below

What about if they all come true !!!!!!!!!!!! then what will you say then? but thank you for your concerns of looking out for your fellow man but we all take a chance in life.The way I see it we have a 50/50 chance of winning or loosing so let us make our own decisons in life and if we want your advice im sure we will ask for.I think if people like Adam and maddog and a few others have done very well in this game of stocks and if they are sticking with this company so am I

Email from stock

If you have been with us over a year you've had a nice profit. Congratulatios.
We've always figured out a way to get done what we say we'll do, even if it
takes more time. We're working through the legal stuff and the bb shell is doing
the governance they need to do. In short, don't worry, things are on track and
just fine.
-----Original Message-----
From: "MANDY BURR" <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:22:43
To:[e-mail]
Subject: NWAU

[ambulance_blues]

The fact of the matter is.... that you lost crediiblity on this board a long time ago when you said something to imply that one of the lots was not open for business, and how nobody was even there to answer the phone. Well, that turned out to be a total lie. And yet at the time, you boasted it as a fact of concern, thinking you could advance your agenda of fear and misinfornation. You were exposed then, and yet you're still here claiming to be an objective witness. You are anything but objective, so I am skeptical that the whole truth would ever make it through your biased lens.

-AB

[ambulance_blues]

Re: What about the Tucson lot not having a lic. prior to July?

It is possible that this is correct, but I am still trying to verify it because the Arizona DOT website is not reliable in my opinion. If it were reliable, then I would say Jalepeno is correct. But I cannot pass as fact something that I believe to be unreliable. For example, according to that website, we do not have a current licesne for the Tempe lot. But I have it in writing that this is false. All our lots are currently licensed and cars are selling. According to Jalepeno, that website "proves" that the Tucson lot was not licensed prior to July. But I would ask him for a more reliable source before taking that website at face value.

-AB