So, if AMD were to pay off the local power company to cut off electricity to Intel's FABs that's OK in your book?
Are you suggesting Intel paid off the local power company to cut off electricity to AMD's FAB's?
Would Intel be "whining" if it called foul after AMD got the mob to hijack half Intel's chip shipments and dump them in the ocean?
Are you suggesting that Intel got the mob to hijack half of AMD's chip shipments and dumped them in the ocean?
How about if AMD were to hack into Intel's banks and siphon off their funds?
Are you suggesting that Intel hacked into AMD's banks and siphoned off their funds?
In short, what the #*&ll are you talking about?
Is this the type of reasoning AMD lawyers will use? LOL. How far out on a tangent must the arguments and counter-arguments of AMD and you Droids go to even come close to "making a case" for this lawsuit?
Face facts. Intel plays hard. Intel kicks AMD's ass. Intel is the winner. AMD is the loser. Crying is not going to change it. The lawsuit is not going to change it. I said losers mistake playing hard with not playing fair, and you come strollin' into the conversation. Hmmmmmm?
Maybe you'd prefer the way things run in some of the more tragic part of the Sudan where they've decided to go with rule of might rather than rule of law.
So now you're going to implicitly compare genocide with Intel's business tactics... repugnant, but amazing the mind of a droid...