InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 778
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/18/2003

Re: Dan3 post# 18994

Monday, 07/11/2005 10:26:42 PM

Monday, July 11, 2005 10:26:42 PM

Post# of 151692
Dan3,

So, if AMD were to pay off the local power company to cut off electricity to Intel's FABs that's OK in your book?

Are you suggesting Intel paid off the local power company to cut off electricity to AMD's FAB's?

Would Intel be "whining" if it called foul after AMD got the mob to hijack half Intel's chip shipments and dump them in the ocean?

Are you suggesting that Intel got the mob to hijack half of AMD's chip shipments and dumped them in the ocean?

How about if AMD were to hack into Intel's banks and siphon off their funds?

Are you suggesting that Intel hacked into AMD's banks and siphoned off their funds?

In short, what the #*&ll are you talking about?

Is this the type of reasoning AMD lawyers will use? LOL. How far out on a tangent must the arguments and counter-arguments of AMD and you Droids go to even come close to "making a case" for this lawsuit?

Face facts. Intel plays hard. Intel kicks AMD's ass. Intel is the winner. AMD is the loser. Crying is not going to change it. The lawsuit is not going to change it. I said losers mistake playing hard with not playing fair, and you come strollin' into the conversation. Hmmmmmm?

BTW, The lawsuit will change if you testify on behalf of AMD, since you have first hand experience with Intel's crimes against AMD. So are you going to answer my previous post to you? http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=6923585

Are you going to answer my questions in this post?

IMHO




Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent INTC News