InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

WithCatz

11/28/11 4:57 PM

#346887 RE: remmy #346878

remmy, I happen to agree with you. But you need to take the numbers to the next level. The SNHs only have "so much" to give up. And compare that to the math required to address both preferreds, TPS and commons.

I won't argue the APR issues -- certainly in a "settlement" that includes the EC that there can be some 'creative' solutions there -- but the numbers of what can be gotten from the SNHs vs. what is required to see a substantial recovery are quite far apart.

This, of course, this doesn't include the wild-cards that many hope and wish for. Like the tax refunds, or JPM volunteering to take the TPS, etc. They're nice hypotheticals, but both are far from being on the table at this time.

I hope you agree with both.

...Catz
icon url

fsshon

11/28/11 5:07 PM

#346892 RE: remmy #346878

Good Post Remy. We need the NEWCO in entirety and the NOL's plus some cash for operation. We can re-age preferreds and debt. Creditors may also be willing for re-aging of thier debt in lieu of Litigation Warrants for DC. Anyone can see they will try and settle DC as fast as possible, since the OWS crowd needs a new calling.

Which is sitting in Judge Collyer's courtroom! :-)
icon url

investorhub123

11/28/11 5:31 PM

#346901 RE: remmy #346878

Totally agree with you on this one, this is my thinking as well. What commons get will come from the Hedgies.