Replies to post #331515 on CMKM Diamonds Inc. (fka CMKX)

[janice shell]

So? Edwards is the first named defendant. But it was definitely Urbie who issued all that stock.

[jarta]

Roilky, ... Do you ever read what you link?

"On March 24, 2010, the grand jury returned a sealed Second Superseding Indictment which added the following defendants: Jeffrey Turino, Nickolaj Vissokovsky and Jeffrey Mitchell. In addition, several new charges were added, alleging that certain defendants engaged in a conspiracy to conduct an enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, a conspiracy to sell unregistered securities and to commit securities fraud and a conspiracy to commit money laundering. On May 6, 2010, the Second Superseding Indictment was unsealed."

http://www.justice.gov/usao/nv/victim_witness/case_updates.html

Edwards was not the only person who had the RICO, selling unregistered securities and money laundering conspiracy charges added.

RICO 5 defendants Count 1: Turino, Edwards, Casavant, Vissokovsky and Spooner.

Conspiracy to sell unregistered securities 10 defendants Count 2: Same 5 defendants (including Casavant), plus Bagley, Mitchell, Dvorak, Gutierrez and Kinney.

The allegation is: "At the direction of CASAVANT and EDWARDS, BAGLEY and MITCHELL issued more than 700 billion (700,000,000,000) shares of CMKM Diamond stock to the conspirators and their designated alter-egos, associates and straw-purchasers."

Casavant received kickbacks from Gutierrez and Kinney's ill-gotten gains alone from CMKM slaes totaling $5.7M.

Money laundering 8 defendants Count 14: Same defendants (including Casavant, but excluding Bagley).BTW, Casavant was also indicted for tax fraud by Count 15.

The second superseding indictment is posted by JS with nuffy's help (in 2 parts) in the sticky links on the top of the home page of this IHUB CMKX Forum. ... eom

[jarta]

Roilky, ... The DOJ site you linked also has this to say about the Big Sting and the elusive Settlement Proceeds you CMKX flaks post incessantly about:

"Additionally, in the course of investigating and litigating the Edwards criminal case, government personnel in the District of Nevada have not encountered any evidence indicating that a government agency conducted a sting operation against naked short sellers of CMKM stock. Government personnel in the District of Nevada have also not come across any evidence of any settlement fund (much less any settlement fund with trillions of dollars) potentially available to pay possible claims of CMKM shareholders. The criminal investigation in the District of Nevada resulting in the United States v. John Edwards, et al., indictment involved no sting operation." ... eom