InvestorsHub Logo

OCMillionaire

11/27/11 4:14 AM

#12114 RE: Confuscious #12112

Confuscious your confused. A few things first off...

#1. I never said I knew KAY. Only emailed him and talked to him on the phone.
#2. Your comment "How can he raise money from investors and not dilute O/S"...its easy, investors put money into it, they get pback a percentage so no need for dilution and they dont always have to get shares back. Kay even said so himself.
#3."The guy was probably talking about the float" probably doesnt work in a court of law nor does it work in real life. SO i could say.....the stock "probably" could go up to thirty cents like the rest of you were claiming back in August. You dont know so dont assume.
#4. I have never said anything about suing(the word suing never came out of my mouth or has been written on this or any other board) anybody. And who is somebody...you are referrencing to me suing everyone? Have you followed me on other boards? I dont talk negative on other boards or my postings so choose you words carefully.
#5. If Kay had real investors and not fluffy pr's do you think this stock would be worth .0056 cents? give me a break. So if a PR came out and said "twitter to aquire ECDC" do you think it would be worth a penny...psssh.

flaflyersfan

11/28/11 10:07 AM

#12121 RE: Confuscious #12112

Confuscious, every example in my post showed the CEO giving away tens of millions of ECDC shares at .001 per share;

Other than the ones he gave himself, they are all free-trading adding to the Float. Now you understand why when there was heavy buying the stock did not go up as people were buying those discounted shares from people making upwards of 1000% on them. As long as the CEO keeps issuing stock at a 40-90% discount to market; nothing ECDC can do could be more important.

Unfortunately with a gagged Transfer Agent, ECDC will be left in the dark until the next financial report which is a minimum of 5 months away.

Good luck.