Replies to post #4240 on NanoTech Gaming Inc (NTGL)

[leotxtx]

mojo; end2war; brg88tx:

i don't have any ties whatsoever w/cetek other than being a recent shareholder (meaning i bought in recently), and i agree w/what end2war is saying

that doesn't mean whoever wants to collect certificates, or to encourage people to be proactive in their due diligence, or to be concerned re the company's direction shouldn't be; each to their own decision what's best for them

but i still maintain the people running cetek should have their due time

that also doesn't mean i much care for the attitude that we should be "scared" what the ceo might do; if that were really true, i myself would rethink my holdings

i should only be concerned re the ceo in regard to the content, trustworthiness, and effectiveness of his or her comments and actions

and i know, that's part of many of ya'll's point re needing more info and disclosure

i need the same thing but am willing to give due time; after that i need to make my own decisions based on my own perceptions, risk tolerance, and opportunies elsewhere

and we should decide a poster's validity based on the content of the post really, not whether he or she is or is not an "insider" or even a "basher" or "pumper" (though i will ignore a poster that just remains repetitive without further substance; and yes, i do that from my own perspective, how can i help otherwise?)

anyway, i think all this discussion is to the good

there's probably a clarifying of one's thougths in re to other stock holdings as well

thanks ya'll