Replies to post #49890 on Calypso Wireless (fka CLYW)

[hokies]

Hey I've got no problem with Sir H on the bod, I'm sure he can be fair and non-biased. To be entirely safe, I'd want someone with zero ties to the company, but Sir H is fine with me. It will just never happen because the last thing Davey wants is someone like that. Sir H would be great for shareholders, he would immediately dump Davey. That alone would get you back to a dime. And if you don't see that, you're blind.

[downsideup]

I've also got no problem with Mr. Ney running for a position on the board. It's his right. All he has to do is conduct an HONEST solicitation of proxies and get elected by those shareholders voting for him.

Otherwise, his recent effort, patterned after and duplicating management's efforts in conducting an illegal proxy campaign... is clearly disqualifying in itself.

Why would I want to support anyone who postures they are "the solution" to CLYW's problems... when what they DO in posturing that... is clearly wrong ?

I want people who WILL follow proper procedure, including caring enough about the law to follow it... not more people who volunteer that they will quite gladly blow off what the law requires of them in order to advance their personal interest... as CLYW has plenty enough of those already.

The obvious errors made already... in themselves... also suggest a clear lack of awareness re the nature of the liability risks... or, some reason to not care what they are, even while taking the first step across the lines... along with that clear bit of confusion re personal interest vs. shareholders interest.

Shareholders clearly don't and won't benefit from any effort based in and intended in enabling wrong doing.

I'd think a few more people might recognize that now...

Do it right... or don't bother...

[downsideup]

Otherwise, I have no reason to think there is a reason for me to care who it is that an "illegal candidate" conducting an "illegal proxy solicitation" is shilling for.

Some will posture he's a shill for Dave...

Some will posture he's a shill for Turrini...

He'll claim he's his own man either way... true or not.

And none of it matters...

The fact the confusion is enabled... is in itself, in part, a proof of the error in the method. The resulting confusion itself is a proof of the problem that it obviously invites... for candidates who self nominate to campaign for an appointment to the office without even having been vetted.

I just don't care if he's shilling for Dave, or shilling for management... as I don't really think entertaining any method that enables introducing any shills is a good idea...