InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 161
Posts 14045
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 02/27/2008

Re: Cougar6 post# 49890

Saturday, 11/12/2011 4:26:18 PM

Saturday, November 12, 2011 4:26:18 PM

Post# of 60938
Otherwise, I have no reason to think there is a reason for me to care who it is that an "illegal candidate" conducting an "illegal proxy solicitation" is shilling for.

Some will posture he's a shill for Dave...

Some will posture he's a shill for Turrini...

He'll claim he's his own man either way... true or not.

And none of it matters...

The fact the confusion is enabled... is in itself, in part, a proof of the error in the method. The resulting confusion itself is a proof of the problem that it obviously invites... for candidates who self nominate to campaign for an appointment to the office without even having been vetted.

I just don't care if he's shilling for Dave, or shilling for management... as I don't really think entertaining any method that enables introducing any shills is a good idea...


Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.