Replies to post #49776 on Calypso Wireless (fka CLYW)

[downsideup]

So, your opinion here is purposed to express you "feeling sorry" for others here... while gloating that you were "right" ? LOL!!

And, that opinion just happens to be focused on encouraging investors to surrender the fight... because Turrini and Peirce are actually the good guys here... because they're willing to give Daic exactly what he wants without a fight, and are willing to throw investors under the bus in the process ?

Remind me again... who is it that is responsible for Turrini being CEO and a board member ? Why was it that Daic put him back on the board, and back in the CEO's job... after the company had fired him for the Baxter Patent embezzlement... when Daic alone (as is made clear in the structure of the fraudulent 2008 agreement, handing control from Carlos to Daic) controlled the board and directed the company's affairs ?

Pattin was there... the same guy who signed everything over to Daic in 2009, even when, before the fact, the board specifically asserted that could not happen, and that Pattin was not authorized to sign what he did... ???

So, Pattin worked for Daic... and, Kathy Daic was appointed to the board... and Turrini worked for no one other than Daic, and himself... but, was placed there by Daic...

Somehow, I don't find it convincing to suggest that "CLYW had no case"... based on the evidence that the same CLYW management, beholden to Daic, are deeply ensnared now, caught red handed, trying to throw the game in favor of Daic, while the CLYW lawyers are exposed committing flagrant malpractice... while defending the management in their effort ?

This doesn't require any rocket science...

[Cougar6]

From the 8K dated 01/19/2010:

"As previously reported in the Company's last 8K on December 24, 2009, the Company has taken steps to halt the actions of Drago Daic et al in their attempts to take the Company's intellectual property. This has resulted in Temporary Restraining Orders (TRO) being issued against Daic, Williamson and their "Receiver", Kelly Stephens. On 1/14/2010, the Eastern District of Texas Federal Court issued a TRO stopping these actions on the '923 patent until 1/27/2010, at which time a hearing will be held to decide if further Court Restraints are warranted. On 1/15/2010, the Superior Court of Harris County, Texas issued a TRO stopping the actions on the remainder of the patents until 1/29/2010, at which time a hearing will be held to decide if further restraints are warranted."

From the 8K of Dec 28th:

"The company has been notified that Mssrs. Drago Diac and Jimmy Williamson have further encumbered our patents and have "assigned" them to a Reciever for the purpose of auctioning them off to the highest bidder. The date that the receiver has set for this "auction" is January 15, 2010 and the authority claimed for this sale is the alleged default of Calypso Wireless Inc of the settlement agreement. The lawyers of Mssrs. Daic and Williamson's have set up a website (calypsopatentsale.com) to advertise this auction."

[downsideup]

"Daic didn't have the patent to sell"...

Exactly. And, I find that particularly interesting...

As... he DID try to sell it ? What do you call it when you sell something you don't own ?

Not only did he "try" to sell it in the fraudulent auction he arranged in 2009... which is thoroughly documented FACT that exists in the court records...

He's ACTUALLY sold "interests" in the patent to others... including some who are also CLYW shareholders. That's WHY you can't trust other "shareholders"... because their interest is corrupted, having been divided from yours, and placed in opposition to other shareholders, as "owners" of the fraudulent "interests" in the patent that Daic has sold them.

Daic offered to sell ME an interest like that. There was even an offering document... so, I know that bit is fact. Not hearsay. And, that proves ANOTHER instance of Daic trying to "sell the patent"... which, with others, seems it establishes a pattern... even though he has never owned anything that he had a right to sell ?

I wonder how the market in resale of those Daic created "interests" in the CLYW patents is working, these days ?

Anyone here want to sell me the "interest" they bought from Daic ?

Maybe we can determine a market price for those securities ?

I wonder who does the accounting for those interests... to keep track of who owns what ?

Looks to me like Daic has been selling shares in an illegal enterprise... the purpose of which is to subvert and destroy CLYW, in order to facilitate the fraud being practiced... in the fraudulent taking of the CLYW owned patents.

Daic has been selling shares in something he doesn't own, and using that effort to try to obtain what he's been selling...

When you see CLYW insiders and investors "behaving oddly" in relation to their professed interest in CLYW's success... perhaps now you know why ?

IMO, anyone who bought into Daic's fraud... and gave him money in return for an "interest" in the patent... or who has otherwise agreed to cooperate in facilitating that effort... is screwed.

Not only did they get scammed by Daic, when he fraudulently sold them that "interest"... or induced their participation... some of those have also been converted into knowing participants in enabling, furthering, and thus also perpetrating that fraud that Daic has been operating...

I believe some of those persons will be going to jail...

Some clearly deserve to...

I think that is likely true of some number of CLYW insiders, and of management... as that seems it best meets the test of Occam's Razor...

Of course, Williams did manage to prevent Daic from completing that "sale" of the patents in 2009... which is the only reason that there is still an issue here to be addressed as a CLYW issue...

That there isn't any "evidence" against Daic, other than that which Turrini can provide... is a total fraud.

That you need Turrini around (helping Daic) just to have him provide evidence against Daic... is a total fraud.

That the value of your investment depends on Turrini... is fraud.

That Turrini being seen as "honest" is a key to realizing value ?

LOL!!! If you believe that crap, man, have you been duped... set up to think that must be true by... who ?

Daic has already provided all the evidence required... to prove that Daic is engaged in fraud... and Turrini's behavior, and Peirce's behavior, in trying to subvert Williams' efforts to hold Daic to account... are now only a further proof.

[Cougar6]

We never heard from the attorney running the state case. The lawyer at the forum was Storm, that is Diac's lawyer, so I can fully understand why he said what he did. The question is why Turrini believed him.