InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 161
Posts 14045
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 02/27/2008

Re: hokies post# 49776

Tuesday, 11/08/2011 3:46:09 PM

Tuesday, November 08, 2011 3:46:09 PM

Post# of 60938
"Daic didn't have the patent to sell"...

Exactly. And, I find that particularly interesting...

As... he DID try to sell it ? What do you call it when you sell something you don't own ?

Not only did he "try" to sell it in the fraudulent auction he arranged in 2009... which is thoroughly documented FACT that exists in the court records...

He's ACTUALLY sold "interests" in the patent to others... including some who are also CLYW shareholders. That's WHY you can't trust other "shareholders"... because their interest is corrupted, having been divided from yours, and placed in opposition to other shareholders, as "owners" of the fraudulent "interests" in the patent that Daic has sold them.

Daic offered to sell ME an interest like that. There was even an offering document... so, I know that bit is fact. Not hearsay. And, that proves ANOTHER instance of Daic trying to "sell the patent"... which, with others, seems it establishes a pattern... even though he has never owned anything that he had a right to sell ?

I wonder how the market in resale of those Daic created "interests" in the CLYW patents is working, these days ?

Anyone here want to sell me the "interest" they bought from Daic ?

Maybe we can determine a market price for those securities ?

I wonder who does the accounting for those interests... to keep track of who owns what ?

Looks to me like Daic has been selling shares in an illegal enterprise... the purpose of which is to subvert and destroy CLYW, in order to facilitate the fraud being practiced... in the fraudulent taking of the CLYW owned patents.

Daic has been selling shares in something he doesn't own, and using that effort to try to obtain what he's been selling...

When you see CLYW insiders and investors "behaving oddly" in relation to their professed interest in CLYW's success... perhaps now you know why ?

IMO, anyone who bought into Daic's fraud... and gave him money in return for an "interest" in the patent... or who has otherwise agreed to cooperate in facilitating that effort... is screwed.

Not only did they get scammed by Daic, when he fraudulently sold them that "interest"... or induced their participation... some of those have also been converted into knowing participants in enabling, furthering, and thus also perpetrating that fraud that Daic has been operating...

I believe some of those persons will be going to jail...

Some clearly deserve to...

I think that is likely true of some number of CLYW insiders, and of management... as that seems it best meets the test of Occam's Razor...

Of course, Williams did manage to prevent Daic from completing that "sale" of the patents in 2009... which is the only reason that there is still an issue here to be addressed as a CLYW issue...

That there isn't any "evidence" against Daic, other than that which Turrini can provide... is a total fraud.

That you need Turrini around (helping Daic) just to have him provide evidence against Daic... is a total fraud.

That the value of your investment depends on Turrini... is fraud.

That Turrini being seen as "honest" is a key to realizing value ?

LOL!!! If you believe that crap, man, have you been duped... set up to think that must be true by... who ?

Daic has already provided all the evidence required... to prove that Daic is engaged in fraud... and Turrini's behavior, and Peirce's behavior, in trying to subvert Williams' efforts to hold Daic to account... are now only a further proof.

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.