InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

DABOSS

01/15/03 5:09 PM

#26032 RE: But Anyway #26030

revenue growth is irrelevant ??? lmao...oh my. It would depend on those growth projections and estimation for reduction in those negative margins, to the point of reaching profitability. Collier's projections were in the neighborhood of the mid $30 million range for top line revenue...that was his crossover point for his retail model.

This is not a dot com. They have, and will have more products for sale in multiple markets.

icon url

Chessplayer

01/15/03 5:10 PM

#26034 RE: But Anyway #26030

But Anyway,

Todays actions looks nothing like your graph.

How do you explain that given that charts never lie.

icon url

Sentinel

01/15/03 5:12 PM

#26035 RE: But Anyway #26030

Strange statements:

Revenue growth is irrelevent when one is running at negative gross margins.

So conjecture regarding future revenue growth for e.Digital is futile until the company makes a decided effort to focus on profitability.


I'm no genius, but aren't revenues almost always relevant? Yes, attention needs to be paid to margins, but revenues need to grow in order to be profitable, ESPECIALLY with low margins. As I understand it, "revenues" are not "the number of units going out the door", i.e. volume (as in "We'll make it up in volume"), but rather money coming in the door. In almost every instance I can think of, that's pretty damn important.

icon url

richardosborne

01/15/03 5:22 PM

#26042 RE: But Anyway #26030

ButAnyway...Revenues are an important element in any business.

And when you speak of negative gross margins, you have to consider that eventually economic order quantities will impact the cost of sales and result in favorable gross margins.

You are forgetting that the system is a dynamic one not a static one with constant ratios.

Your intellect is not showing very well.