Replies to post #19598 on Solidus Communications Inc (SLDC)

[EquityTrader]

lmcat, what do you think of the ATNA feasibility study?

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/atna-completes-briggs-drilling-with-strong-gold-intercepts-2011-10-12

SUGO should be next!

[Farrago]

I'm not going to go read all of this stuff or re-read all your old messages as I typically glance through them and only find myself wondering how you have so much time to post about a company you don't own...but to each their own.

What I don't understand...

You said you posted 5 mile by 5 mile which is 25 square miles, 5x larger than the mineralized zones where drill holes were completed, and 2.5x larger than the 10 square mi area covering the 331 claims.

That's if I'm reading your post correctly...

[CLP08]

Is it really a distortion?..go read your post again, actually here it is:

"Re: Old Geologist Post# 19527
East side of the ridge - OMG that would release dust and air pollution into Death Valley National Park!

Take a look at a topo map of Conglomerate Mesa and then draw in a 10 mile open pit mine. Drive for 10 miles and realize how long that is. Even a 5 mile by 5 mile destruction is HUGE!

We're not talking about an underground mine with a small footprint on the landscape!

What do you think will be left? What will stop swirling winds from blowing dust and air pollution down into both Owens Valley and Death Valley?

http://www.timberline-resources.com/main.php?page=83";

You did mention a 5x5 but by saying that was even huge compared to the 10 that you say sugo will try...stop twisting the facts and even your own posts around.

[914paul]

You may be confusing "5 square miles" with "5 miles square", which are two different areas.

[Old Geologist]

Cat again just because you say it, does not make it true.

"Take a look at a topo map of Conglomerate Mesa and then draw in a 10 mile open pit mine. Drive for 10 miles and realize how long that is." that is what you said followed by: "Even a 5 mile by 5 mile destruction is HUGE!" So you did say a ten mile pit which is such a distortion of reality. Even a 5x5 mile pit is a distortion of reality. Now I know that you know nothing about geology but when they state a 2.5 mile long trend that does not translate that the entire length will be mineralized. In fact it is not all going to be mineralized. We don't even know if there is 500 feet mineralized to an extent that it would become a mine, yet here you are talking about 10x10 mile open pits. In Nevada there are many trends, the Carlin trend, Battle Mountain trend, Walker Lane trend all of which are in excess of 50 miles long. Does that mean there is a 50 mile long pit on these trends. Again take your time and think.... NO there are not. These are just areas where the tectonics and stratigraphy have the preparation and the heat sources and fluid sources are such that there is a higher likelihood for deposits along these trends.