Replies to post #69669 on CBA Florida Inc. (fka CBAI)

[tbk420]

Mind clarifying what a "strategic evaluation" means?

See, that's the problem. The PR has a lot of words strung together that mean nothing specific.

My guess is that your hands are tied here as well.

Way to go, Matt "Mr. Transparency" Schissler. We appreciate you reaching out to us, reassuring us, and increasing our comfort level.

[bsm1967]

I don't expect an answer but what was the point of the PR? Was that for the shareholders benefit? I just don't see how after how the past few months have gone and what has been said that Matt wanted to actually come out and say something like that and how he seems to want to kick us while we are down...

When most longs are down over 90% with this investment to say they may or may not act to create value is a kick in the nuggets if you ask me...

[The_Scraps_Rock]

I figured that was the case. I just wanted to see if my question was general enough to be answered. Thanks anyway.

[xxxx]

What about those that asked relative to the upcoming DTC hearing in DC. Will Matt or Rep be attending?

[Starlost]

Ok, we understand you don't have anything extra to add in terms of information, etc. But Paul, please comment on this:

its Board of Directors will conduct a process to explore and evaluate strategic alternatives for Cord Blood America to enhance shareholder value.

And then in the following paragraph:

Cord Blood America has not set a timetable for completion of the evaluation process or made a decision to pursue any particular transaction or other alternative, and there can be no assurance that any transaction or other alternative will be pursued or completed.

Please comment on the point of telling investors they will "conduct a process to explore and evaluate strategic alternatives" and then almost in the same breath state "there can be no assurance that any transaction or other alternative will be pursued or completed."

So which is it? They will, or there is no assurance that another alternative will be pursued?

Come on Paul, you can't have it both ways? They will, or they won't? I don't get it.

[Starlost]

Here's a repeat of my question which you have failed to address:

Ok, we understand you don't have anything extra to add in terms of information, etc. But Paul, please comment on this:
Quote:
its Board of Directors will conduct a process to explore and evaluate strategic alternatives for Cord Blood America to enhance shareholder value.


And then in the following paragraph:
Quote:
Cord Blood America has not set a timetable for completion of the evaluation process or made a decision to pursue any particular transaction or other alternative, and there can be no assurance that any transaction or other alternative will be pursued or completed.

Please comment on the point of telling investors they will "conduct a process to explore and evaluate strategic alternatives" and then almost in the same breath state "there can be no assurance that any transaction or other alternative will be pursued or completed."

So which is it? They will, or there is no assurance that another alternative will be pursued?

Come on Paul, you can't have it both ways? They will, or they won't? I don't get it.

[Starlost]

Paul, I've asked this of you 3 times now. Strange how you are nowhere to be found after this lame PR. My question does not ask you to reveal more than what is in the PR itself. Explain the PR as I've asked you to do here:

Ok, we understand you don't have anything extra to add in terms of information, etc. But Paul, please comment on this:
Quote:
its Board of Directors will conduct a process to explore and evaluate strategic alternatives for Cord Blood America to enhance shareholder value.


And then in the following paragraph:
Quote:
Cord Blood America has not set a timetable for completion of the evaluation process or made a decision to pursue any particular transaction or other alternative, and there can be no assurance that any transaction or other alternative will be pursued or completed.

Please comment on the point of telling investors they will "conduct a process to explore and evaluate strategic alternatives" and then almost in the same breath state "there can be no assurance that any transaction or other alternative will be pursued or completed."

So which is it? They will, or there is no assurance that another alternative will be pursued?

Come on Paul, you can't have it both ways? They will, or they won't? I don't get it.