Tell you what, you show me your link to the proof an insider didn't sell. Then we'll have something won't we? Why is it that third, fourth and fifth party hearsay from people who I strongly suspect might someday be linked directly to Brown is taken as the gospel on Expo Holdings, Inc. by the certain usual few entities if it is coming from a proven unreliable source and is very likely the usual complete prevarication and the exact opposite is true if the hearsay is coming from a normally truthful source? The source you are questioning has been correct about Expo Holdings, Inc. nearly 100% of the time. As have been many others who post about negative Expo issues that turn out to be the truth nearly 100% of the time. I have yet to see a single accurate post from anyone defending this blatant scam in TWO YEARS. TWO YEARS and not a single accurate post. So why is it the perpetually incorrect and totally misled side is constantly demanding linked proof from the perpetually truthful and correct side of the Expo issues I wonder? Could it be that the only chance of manipulating a scam stock that has been exposed is to desperately grasp at straws trying to raise false doubt as to the obvious truth by demanding black and white proof of every single word? IMHO.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
