This is simple SBB, proving a company is a scam is an ongoing process that can't be proven until something happens outside of what the touts say, or the company becomes transparent and provides the information themselves. Trucks leaving EXPH loaded with ETC product for 100's of retailers becomes a fact because a trusted long provided the information for those that believed. The only way to dispute the lies told here takes time as the company fumbles and bumbles it's way with their ineptitude. If it wasn't for ACC and itrader we may still be in the dark about the lawsuits and IRS liens, but even without that information, we all knew this was a scam from day one.
------------------------------
Tell you what, you show me your link to the proof an insider didn't sell. Then we'll have something won't we? Why is it that third, fourth and fifth party hearsay from people who I strongly suspect might someday be linked directly to Brown is the gospel on Expo Holdings, Inc. if it is coming from a proven unreliable source and is very likely a complete prevarication as usual and the exact opposite is true if it is very likely the hearsay is the truth and coming from a normally truthful source? The source you are questioning has been correct about Expo Holdings, Inc. nearly 100% of the time as have been many others who post about negative Expo issues that turn out to be the truth very nearly 100% of the time. I have yet to see a single accurate post from anyone defending this blatant scam in TWO YEARS. TWO YEARS and not a single accurate post. So why is it the perpetually incorrect and totally misled side is constantly demanding linked proof from the correct side I wonder? IMHO.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
