How can the MNTA's case be proven or not w/o the discovery? Seems like the Judge would allow, so the facts are determined for all and to prevent unwarranted damage to MNTA.
The sealed bit of this case must hold a partial key to a final determination.
How do you see MNTA's share price reacting in such a scenario? I imagine it may come down to how soon the market sees FDA approval and launch of a third generic (I assume you're not counting an authorized generic from SNY as being a "third" generic) and what level of sales you ultimately see from aL and any others. On the third generic, I don't see it necessarily being too distant for Teva getting approval and launching tL given that Amphastar was able to get their approval now. I have no idea on what projections are for aL. Is it likely that the generic Lovenox market will be roughly divided up evenly amongst the number of entrants in due time? If so, that would still likely be a 20% royalty on at least a few $100M in tL sales due to MNTA in your scenario I would imagine, on top of the royalties MNTA would be due from NVS.