InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

stockmasterflash

09/27/11 12:28 PM

#47791 RE: adrian taylor #47790

Were any of the women asked about pregnancy status?

Seriously.

6-8 feet isn't enough of a liability barrier if any of the women attending the demonstration were pregnant.

IMGG admits it hsa little in the way of liability insurance. Does this show good judgement? To even have that many shareholders on the premises, let alone exposing them to radiation.

icon url

Homer Simpson

09/27/11 12:28 PM

#47792 RE: adrian taylor #47790

You could assume, but since the OH attendies signed a NDA, you could not be sure. Besides, apparently there was a distance requirement that was observed and I'm sure this was all checked out in advance. You could send a note to info@imaging3.com if you want more details about the open house. I would not presume anything at this point if I was not there.

Yes, it was real time 3D imaging
Yes, the DViS is real
Yes, the radiation from the DViS is low
Yes, the DViS is portable
Yes, the checkered flag will be waving soon for Dean, Imaging3 and the DViS!

If you didn't go, you don't know.
Long and Strong until the final gong!
icon url

cl1021

09/27/11 12:55 PM

#47796 RE: adrian taylor #47790

AT - please don't assume aprons and lead shields were required. I was using the lead apron/ER as an example. There are many materials that can be used for shielding - including a basic wall of drywall and 2x4s. Shielding is not required if distance does the trick. If the documentation shows that that the dose at 6 feet was background then they wouldn't need shielding.