How blind could we have been? Those shares traded at .33 were probably needed to sell short. Now that naked shorting is alledgedly a no no, actual shares will be required to sell short. I mentioned this to a couple of people when it was occurring but didnt want to post it here or on RB and get people worked up. We may have another indicator to work with though; periods of large accumulation followed by a price collapse?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
